Argument and Reconciliation

نویسندگان

  • Robert A. Kowalski
  • Francesca Toni
چکیده

We outline a formal theory of argumentation-theoretic reasoning which uniies and generalises many existing approaches to default reasoning, and which promises to be useful for practical reasoning in general and legal reasoning in particular. We discuss an extension of the argumentation theory to the problem of reconciling connicting arguments .

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Can we reconcile? Understanding the multi-level challenges of conflict transformation

Introduction This article is concerned with the challenges and (im)possibilities of reconciliation. Framed around the question, 'Can we reconcile?', in what follows I consider the political challenges involved in attempting to restore broken relationships and find ways to live together, democratically and non-violently, with radical differences (Ramsbotham, Woodhouse, and Miall 2011 :246). The ...

متن کامل

Stress reduction through consolation in chimpanzees.

Consolation, i.e., postconflict affiliative interaction directed from a third party to the recipient of aggression, is assumed to have a stress-alleviating function. This function, however, has never been demonstrated. This study shows that consolation in chimpanzees reduces behavioral measures of stress in recipients of aggression. Furthermore, consolation was more likely to occur in the absen...

متن کامل

Determinants of Completing the Medication Reconciliation Form Among Nurses Based on Diffusion of Innovation Theory

Background &Objectives:Patientsafety is a global medical concern with remarkable influence onthe health of patients. Studies have suggested thattreatment-related damages occur in approximately 10% of patients at variable degrees, and more than a quarter of these damages are associated with medication errors. Medication errors could be diminished during patient hospitalization and transferusing ...

متن کامل

On-Line Nonlinear Dynamic Data Reconciliation Using Extended Kalman Filtering: Application to a Distillation Column and a CSTR

Extended Kalman Filtering (EKF) is a nonlinear dynamic data reconciliation (NDDR) method. One of its main advantages is its suitability for on-line applications. This paper presents an on-line NDDR method using EKF. It is implemented for two case studies, temperature measurements of a distillation column and concentration measurements of a CSTR. In each time step, random numbers with zero m...

متن کامل

Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions

This paper begins a working-through of Blair’s (2001) theoretical agenda concerning argumentation schemes and their attendant critical questions, in which we propose a number of solutions to some outstanding theoretical issues. We consider the classification of schemes, their ultimate nature, their role in argument reconstruction, their foundation as normative categories of argument, and the ev...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1994